From mward@gte.net Wed Jun 04 11:53:37 1997 From: Matt Ward Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,news.admin.net-abuse.misc,alt.christnet,alt.ethics,alt.internet.services,misc.legal,news.admin.censorship,misc.legal.computing Subject: Re: More on GTE.NET censoring usenet while publishing child porn Date: 4 Jun 1997 15:53:37 GMT Organization: None Lines: 18 Message-ID: <5n4321$57a$1@news9.gte.net> References: <337bcba2.37430893@news1.ibm.net> <5ls3if$1qf$2@news8.gte.net> <33837189.167EB0E7@aztec.asu.edu> <33863232.24833969@news.alt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: donald.gte.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth: D819D5415691849517C18491 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0SC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.3 IP32) To: boursy@alt.net Path: oscar.chudys.com!cpk-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-pull.sprintlink.net!news-in-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!207.115.134.241!newsfeed.gte.net!news Xref: oscar.chudys.com talk.politics.misc:1116 news.admin.net-abuse.misc:649 alt.christnet:1147 alt.internet.services:302 misc.legal:275 news.admin.censorship:184 misc.legal.computing:41 Stephen Boursy wrote: > > mama n wrote: > - > -While the topic of this thread may have mentioned child pornography, it > -is quickly devolving into a battle between personalities, which is not > > It involves the good Reverend Winters resolve to work with > congress regarding kiddie porn--including with the office > of Senator Helms. He's concerned, and I agree, that if > a provider accepts responsibilty for part of its feed they > become liable for all of it's feed. > Which is EXACTLY why we do NOT monitor content, only behaviour. -- "One will not have needed the Future Perfect in one's entire life" - William Safire. /\/\ a tt == mward@gte.net == Alpha Geek